On Sex & Gender Relations

Good day, World.

We live in a country where everything has been sexed up in order to pull money out of us. For men, they use beautiful women and body parts to advertise everything from sports and cars to food and hygiene items. These things are spun as badges of success or attractiveness, items that will definitely impress a woman enough to make her at least want to sleep with you. Meanwhile, women's sexuality is used to manipulate them into spending money in order to either appeal to us or at the very least to "feel more confident" and conventionally attractive. Either way, the ultimate goal of these advertisers is to play on people's emotional immaturity, personal insecurities, and hormones in order to pump more money out of our wallets and back upstream.

Unfortunately, the transactional nature of the society we live in has scaled this idea into the meta, as both capitalism and religion have created artificial barriers to sex. Instead of two responsible people who are attracted to each other feeling as if they can pursue having relations immediately, now they have to consider the following in no particular order:

1.) Whether their chosen invisible friend approves of their choice or not;

2.) The state of their physical health/sexual safety;

3.) Whether or not they can impress or even hold the attention of the other with their physical items/residence;

4.) The potential financial fallout of negative consequences in the future.

All of these aspects involve finances in a way, as even religion has tithing and offering giving to the church. Health care is directly connected to your bank account, possessions are by nature capitalistic, and the ramifications of undesired outcomes on one's money cannot be overstated. This means that sex in our society is tied very purposely to money, with the most obvious  consequence of that being the existence of prostitution. If these barriers didn't exist, would there be a need for it, or would people who normally would be separated by these things be allowed to interact with each other freely? This is tangential conjecture, but a point to consider.

While all these considerations are being made by people who want to have sex with each other, the animal urges to orgasm and feel the endorphins created by it rages underneath for many. This seething sexual tension is the motivating factor these companies have seized upon to take your money from you, as we are all humans with the desire to feel good. This is why Ashley Madison exists, ads on porn encourage you to cheat, and pop music and media push the narrative of "side chicks" and "other men." Irresponsibility breeds more money being spent in this deluded society, so why not support the artist that makes people spend more?

However, this overarching structure leaves men with the feeling that they are worthless and will never have sex with anyone unless they are rich or conform to a narrow standard. It makes women seem to only want men for their money or the appearance of such, and as men are generally bad at listening to women, they accept that as a talking point. Indeed, these power structures will additionally elevate women who reinforce this idea of patriarchal wealth equalling sexual value, as well, while they reject all but the safest forms of female rebellion and freedom. The safest forms (gay-inclusive pop music, films with female protagonists, female characters in kids shows etc.) are monetized beyond moral value, making them almost hypocritical when you see the environment that produced them. Yes, the idea that men are not valued and attracted to based solely upon their financial worth is quite feminist and anti-capitalist, as if you invert the thought it becomes "Just because you're rich doesn't make you a man worthy of giving my body to."

So what happens when a system convinces you women will never fuck you unless you fill a long, difficult checklist? What about when you are in the process of filling out said list, but she doesn't want to anyway? Well, if you managed to ignore the entire wall of shit that is the Capitalist Sex Manifesto, you would remember that women are people, not NPCs with a dialogue tree that will lead to sex if you hit the right button combos. Women's health issues, individual desires, and opinions on what constitutes being "sexy" are all factors in how things go. Unfortunately, it is easier when slighted to recede into the arms of someone who will reinforce your ideas rather than challenge them. This is how the so-called "manosphere" began to form, with the bad actors and spouters of quasi-scientific malarkey primed to swoop in and take advantage of emotionally unintelligent men. This creates an anger based solely upon the perception that women are guilty of withholding something they deserve, as they have gone down the checklist they created with little input from women and found themselves without a partner. 

"It's women's fault that I'm not in a relationship."

"Women have all the power when it comes to sex."

"Immigrant men should be ejected, but immigrant women should have one year to get with a white incel to keep their citizenship."

These are paraphrasings of clips I've heard online just this past week.

Remove your need for sex from women's responsibility. Your lack of orgasms is absolutely your fault, and it has nothing to do with your checklist. You have a hand, right? Use it to masturbate instead of writing hate messages about how your wife won't fuck you to your friends. Jerk off instead of posting memes about how dumb women are or pictures of other women in bikinis. Then maybe you can calmly sit down with a woman you're intimate with (or trying to be) and talk about it instead of the hormones hijacking your brain before you speak. Maybe it has nothing to do with physical attraction or even you at all. This open hostility towards women because all of the ones men are attracted to don't have a magnetic pussy that draws just their individual penis into it has to stop immediately. 

--------

Just here. Nowhere else.

-∅

P.S.A.

The wealthy never forgot that money is merely a physical stand in for ownership of property. Ultimately, collateral is the end goal, which is why if an economy collapses the wealthy continue to be so until the people physically remove the material wealth from the former social elite. Unfortunately, they have convinced us, the people, that possessing the means to having collateral is the end game. With this, the aristocracy can then withhold and trickle out the finances themselves to the slave class while simultaneously bleeding us of whatever we can hold onto. Again, fees, fines, exorbitant prices, and taxes drain the currency from us, leaving us wanting for the money itself.

However, there is another way to being able to gain some shreds of independence from this slavery. In short, finding a way to own things will free you from traps that the wealthy set to drain us. No, the hyper rich do not need any more cash in their coiffeurs, but they do need you to not have enough to truly own anything. The rampant waste that we see every day in retail stores, restaurants, and government spending is proof enough of that. No, it is the position of ownership, of being the one who doles out the money or receives the rent, that is the true seat of power. Any way we can take that authority away from someone else and return it to the individual is a step toward personal freedom.

This is why the elite fight so hard to maintain the thin veneer of erudition and significance their branding has created for them in a system designed fundamentally around building and maintaining façades. After all, if most people don't need new cars, then what is the actual value of your automotive company? If people are growing their own vegetables, why do they need a grocery store that wastes out produce by the metric ton? You can only artificially inflate your worth so much before faith in your brand starts to fall away. They push their way into everything, making us need them for transportation, food, shelter, etc. and insisting and encroaching upon more of every aspect of our lives every day. However, we can pull back and away from this tactic with some effort, time, and focus. People who don't need whatever you're trying to sell them are unable to be controlled and can focus on what they want to do with themselves. 

Unfortunately, it's the want that they use to manipulate the rest of our money out of us. Good marketing is a bitch, isn't it? Separate and serious the fuck up. Now's not the time for leisure. Cut their funds, devalue their businesses by saying no and becoming more self-reliant. Your goal should be to own whatever you have so you are not paying some jackass sitting on a yacht somewhere just to exist. If you have good credit, get land. If you have bad credit, buy a used car and learn to fix it yourself. Don't leave your current apartment for a bigger one, downsize until you can get a mobile home, fix it, and move in. Learn the right ways to buy used and secondhand (NOT THRIFT!) as much as practical so as to keep the money cycling amongst the people. Purchase tools and learn how to use them so you don't end up paying crooked middlemen that would overcharge and take advantage of you. All of these things involve investing in yourself rather than someone else, and that is another truth of ownership: knowledge and stewardship go hand and hand. 

Remember: Being scared of doing different things will hinder you from seeing new possibilities and keeps feeding into the loop that the wealthy have set to trap us in. Retain your funds with the express purpose of investing in your own freedom, and learn to identify when someone parading around as a "service" is really part of a network of parasites that have convinced you that they're necessary. You don't want more money, really, because money is just a vehicle to get you what you want in life. Simple analogy - Fishermen fish for fish using a boat. Having a boat isn't the fisherman's goal, but a necessity to get himself his fish. Remember to separate those two things and adjust accordingly.

-∅

Trump's Liberation Day in the United States

 Good day, World.

So, here we are post-Liberation Day here in the United States. The Drumpf-in-Chief used ChatGPT to make a tariff policy that is currently tanking the world economy. This inept crone managed the destabilization of the entire stock market with a few pen strokes and within three months of being seated upon what is now the gilded toilet throne of his reign. Meanwhile, the richest man in the world sharpens his claws upon the rest of us, prying regulatory agencies and public services that our taxes pay for away from those who need it most in order to fund contracts his companies has with the government. Lower level politicians are falling in line in record numbers in order to not be leveled by the steam train of bullshit that they have unleashed, contorting themselves into rails and timbers instead of being tied to the tracks. Banks and private firms are seizing property however they can in order to maintain a monopoly over the only true power there is: land ownership. The Apocalypse is upon us and the wall of fire is sweeping through.

What is the end game of the elite? Zero sum victory, aristocracy, and freedom from real consequences. They are weak as individuals and need their egos coddled, since most were born with advantage and protection from any semblance of the world we live in, so a major component of their existence is framed upon maintaining that separation. Paradoxically, these ego concerns also involve keeping the appearance of general benevolence to the public from behind this shroud, as the need to be liked seems to also be a common thread. "Don't eat that rich guy/lady specifically" is the general theme they shoot for, similar to the "not all men" or "I'm a nice guy" people do. 

So what do we do? Break the images of those people. The more we do to expose how horrific some of these businesses, politicians, and "leaders" actually are, the better decisions we can make as a collective regarding how society should be ran and by whom. Learn about the companies and policies tied to these civic leaders and bourgeoisie and divest, depose, and disavow all those who would harm you. Keep your money, vote them out, and assassinate their character with the stray bullets of truth and horror they left lying around after their own crimes.

Secondly, get hard assets however you can and store them. The opposition's goal is to rob and fleece everyone for every dollar we have via fees, tariffs, taxes, and ridiculous markups. They desire total ownership and dominion over all physical property, leaving us to use whatever survival money we have to lease or subscribe for the use of the items we are no longer allowed to have outright. The last thing they want is for you to be in control of anything, so they appeal to laziness and your ego in order to manipulate your buying patterns. Instead of, say, leasing a car, one could buy a used car and learn to fix it so you don't pay some faceless company an extra $10,000 over the already hyper-inflated sticker price over the course of 5 years. That's your car now, not some dealer that can come take it if you miss a payment. 

Fight them with your mind. The more you look at how you are being taken advantage of, the more you can take steps to stay viable versus a society that has been manipulated to take everything from you. For example: Eliminate middlemen as much as you can in every area of your life, thus learning new skills and becoming more self-reliant. Do you need new clothes, but have very low funds? Learn how to thrift shop and sew instead of buying from Amazon, Target, Walmart, etc. Is there a repair you need to make in your apartment so that your landlord doesn't steal your $2000 security deposit for a $150 fix? Watch a video and do it yourself. Are you losing money with your heating bill? Learn how to temporarily insulate your house in the winter to help save money instead of hemorrhaging free cash to the power or oil company. On a micro level: Are you spending too much money on takeout? Teach yourself to cook quick things instead of feeding DoorDash and UberEats 33% of your order price for literally no reason.

You are not too stupid, too weak, or too inept to learn something new, and whatever it is that you do learn will help in the future. Every dollar you wring away from the hands of the rich is the beginning of a safety net for yourself, and knowing who to keep your money away from helps devalue your enemy. Their goal is your money. Keep it.

-∅

What is DEI?

Good day, World.

Now that the powers that be in the United States government are excoriating and purging anything from its existence that involves what they deem as "DEI woke programming," it is important in this moment to define what exactly they mean by this. See, unlike the surprised millions that have begun to cry out in protest since the plans have begun being executed, I see that the Orange Emperor and his flying monkeys have been telling everyone the entire time this would happen. Trump and his ilk played upon your own fears and prejudices in order to fleece you, specifically by never defining what the full scope of DEI implied so that you would never consider being a part of the out group. Having always been a member of one of the oldest minorites, however, I knew what was to come. 

One must keep in mind the basic messaging behind leftists versus most of every other political group. In general terms, the Left proclaims they desire things to be more simple for everyone, with assistance for previously ignored or disenfranchised groups like the disabled, minorities that have endured hardships over generations, social outcasts, etc. Meanwhile, the Right says these problems aren't real because acknowledging the fucked up things they or their families had to do to get rich and powerful might make them feel bad or something. What's the point of power if there's no slaves to lord over? 

"Unchecked Capitalism: It Works For Me!"™️

The problem with the poor, stupid Redhats is that they never noticed the terminology used. See, when you roll back the tape on human rights in America, you may notice that there are a lot of groups that have been given basic rights and benefits over time. Women, children, ethnic and social minorities, the disabled, the elderly, the poor and homeless, and others have been given things in order to acknowledge the inequalities and failures of the present system to adequately care for its citizens. These, my friends, are all considered groups that could be lumped into DEI. People in the center of the country are ballasted by federally redistributed funds from states full of "coastal elites," and now those funds are being taken away, now the pale center of the country feels the sinking realization that perhaps they were not fully informed on who these DEIggers were.

See, they took the implication game, used it to play against your racism, and then played you. Yes, there are token gestures of casual racism happening, as the mass removal of anything that could even be construed as beige happens throughout government buildings and websites, but really we're all DEIggers now. 

So, what's to be done? Opposite motion. Does someone who voted for your annihilation tell you to endorse something or someone? Do the opposite. Find an alternative. Research what brands your politicians are tied to and sever yours to them. Stay out of jail and sabotage their pockets, as money is all they care about. Pool resources with large groups, then move to Red states en masse and terraform the voting structures of places, colonizing and gentrifying like the rich do to us. Don't spend any money and hold your income. In the end, doing what you are directed to do always suits someone else's plan. Make one.

-∅

On Anger

 Just had an observation. Some people use anger like a costume, a blustering external display in order to retain control, instill fear, or otherwise manipulate the perception of onlookers. They like to whip frenzies, speak whichever dog whistle phrases are most effective at sparking more in others, and generally speak in flat, opaque terms. The simplest solution to whichever problem their non-diagnosed brains find most pressing is always best to these people, and usually said answer ends with some out group reaping the net negatives of whatever broad problem they complain most about. It is a mask, and whether they genuinely understand what they are doing or not depends upon their level of intelligence.

Some people hold anger like lava in their bellies, vomiting forth from their esophagus with very little control as to its direction once it begins to flow. It is a constantly roiling, almost alive thing that hisses and snaps at the slightest provocation, but does not erupt without prior warning. Even while the surface may seem solid, the slag that forms atop the pool is merely a thin illusion that is still hundreds of degrees to the touch. Contained by one's own guts, it burns them and anyone they come in contact with if too many stimuli shake them. They just want peace, but the world will not let it come.

When these two meet, we find ourselves in the situations that we are in today. The world is being run by a bunch of blusterers who have systems full of sociopaths murdering us every day in myriad ways. Wars waged by inaccurate and soulless AI, destitute people left to the wolves as government services get cut, government tariffs stealing more money out of everyone's pockets as we all struggle to figure out what is next...we are the lava swallowers. We eat the fire we are given and try to survive on it, but we are left with the anger of the struggle. It is a slow thing, a digested anger that we believe we have processed, but have not. 

Our anger is meeting the bluster of several empty, costumed bullies and making their façades collapse. They are sociopaths underneath and we see it. Keep fighting. Control the lava flow as best you can. Keep it legal, keep it decentralized, keep going.

-∅

On Race Relations and The Far Right

Good day, World.

So, a lot of Right-leaning whites rely heavily upon stereotypes in their thinking regarding black individuals because they refuse to engage with an individual they already think themselves better than. Instead of seeing us as a person, then, they view every black person as a walking embodiment of every negative stereotype they're ever heard, a monolithic, slightly sexy, threatening presence that is here to steal their women, lie to their family, and kill them. No matter what we wear, how we act, or how qualified we are, we are the liberal scum, the oldest thorn in the side of the Republican dream for existing in their spaces. 

Unfortunately, they are unable to see past a manufactured veil of negativity pushed by the racist elites that magnifies our negative aspects and purposely obfuscates our positive ones. I still remember making a semi-serious video a long time ago about how to interact with black people. I just said that you should deal with us as individuals, not whatever preconceived notions you have, just like every other person you know. Now, none of my content has a lot of reach, so I was not expecting anything from, well, anyone. Soon after, however, I got an angry comment from a user. After clicking their profile, I saw that they literally made a response video of the most racist stereotypes I could ever hear. "Black people WILL steal from you" and stuff like that. I couldn't even ask to be judged as a human, not a stereotype without some destitute, brainwashed white bigot getting so angered by it that he needed to make a response video. Ridiculously good programming.

Most whites seem to be able to push past the hatred and see that it is a ruse, but these extremists that have steered our country toward ruin and division also happen to be the oligarchs and aristocrats that truly turn the wheels behind the scenes. Even those who do make it through the fog are still left with lasting perceptions and leftover prejudices that I have been told to my face were things they had to work through. I sincerely hope that more can fight past it and realize that we are all in this together, and with the current state of the country, we need it now more than ever.

How? Engage with people you don't know. Is a racial, ethnic, or minority group being demonized in the media? Talk with those willing to talk with you, as not every person is willing to engage with someone they may perceive as a threat. The key difference between the fears of the negatively stereotyped minority and those who spin the prevailing narrative is that the out group exists within a society that collectively decided unless said culture fit a very narrow set of arbitrarily shifting standards that they should not exist. This is the height of hypocrisy, as they consistently strip and assimilate any unique aspect of any culture they find entertaining or attractive.

Have a basic conversation. Talk and listen. Everyone can use this simple advice these days, as understanding leads to progress and willful ignorance plays neatly into the plans of the fascists and out-of-touch billionaires that would use you. 

Twitter is dead. All transmissions through here.

-∅

Reasons Whites Use To Justify Using the N-Word

In life, I have found myself involved in situations where whites have felt the need to use the word "nigger" around or toward me. Due to the fact that I am a black male of some size that has several non-typically ascribed interests and hobbies, this is not an uncommon occurrence for me. Here are some of the justifications I have heard from people over the years for using offensive speech whilst being righteously indignant regarding my discomfort with it.

"You were acting like one." Okay. So, what exactly does that entail? Why is it that when we agree, I'm just a dude, but when we don't, I'm that?

"You made me mad." Variant of the first one. Why does anger equal "Well, now I get to be racist!" to you? I've never once thought to be racist toward you during the whole argument.

"I didn't call YOU one." This comes with being considered "one of the good ones" in their area/vicinity. Being racist towards other black people around me isn't winning you points in the Friend category, and seeing you lapse into that as soon as you dislike someone is very telling.

"It just means ignorant." Why do you think it means that? Really think about it, don't skip the mental exercise. You may need it if you don't get it.

"You guys say it all the time!" First, way to assume every single black person in America and abroad is exactly the same in how we feel about that word. Secondly, do I speak like that naturally? Have you ever known me to casually say it, or do I do it purely for comedic effect every time?

"It's just a word." Direct translation: "I'm going to purposely say offensive shit. It's not my fault you're hurt by my actions. I'm a social parasite."