Thursday, October 18, 2012

On Being Programmed


    Has anyone else noticed that authority figures like businesses and governments don't want you to think for yourself? Consider everything you may or may not have in your home to distract you: phones, iPods, movies, televisions, computers, game systems...all of these serve one purpose: to keep people content. TV feeds you what it wants you to watch, the internet is currently being tailored to cut certain content,and the radio only plays certain songs over and over. It's like we're watching a constant tape, looped over and over again in order to keep you docile.
     On the outside, movies, sports, and music have become so hyped that people will line up outside of a venue to spend exorbitant amounts of money just to watch other people doing things that, in the broad spectrum of things, don't mean anything. Entire industries have been built around "entertainment" around the world, siphoning billions of dollars out of people around the world for decades. The same goes for clothing, highly-processed food, alcohol, sex, religion, tobacco, politics, celebrities, and a slew of other industries that we may or may not know about.
     This cacophony of white noise has deadened our senses, leaving us paralyzed in the worlds we exist in. It is this constant sensory overload that western culture wants us to exist in every day, spending our money aimlessly as we trip along and do what whichever authority figure tells us to do. The powers that be want our money, our blindness, and our silent cooperation. And, for the most part, that's what Westerners tend to give them, unblinking as we worship whatever idol they erect for us. We slip into fanaticism over the dumbest things, going as far as to paint our faces, buy hyper-expensive clothing, wave signs, and even shed tears or commit suicide over things that have nothing to do with us!
     Whatever happened to thinking? Whatever happened to silence? What happened to the person that can sit down, organize their thoughts, and make rational decisions? It seems, reader, that these are becoming more few and far between as time goes on. How many times have you seen a person jump on a bandwagon lately? When you ask said people why they enjoy whatever activity or device, how many can give you a rational answer?
     Here's a perfect example: I used to have a few friends that watched every television program that came on MTV. They liked Four Loko, listening to pop radio, getting wasted and high all the time, tanning until they were orange, and otherwise living like "guidettes." When I asked them why they liked the shows (as well as the alcohol, which tastes like utter shit), they looked at me like I was crazy. "Why DON'T you like them?" was the closest response that I could glean from them, their scraggly, rat-textured hair appropriately "bumped" and dyed. I had to do away with them simply because I realized they didn't have much of a mind left. MTV had brainwashed them into tanned, constantly inebriated, drama-fueling bitches, and everyone in my circle was content with that.

Everyone except me, obviously.

     In the end, people like what they like. They dedicate their time to things that may or may not "mean" anything in the grand scheme of things. I understand that. However, I also understand that all of these things that people fall into are distractions from the problems that are not only happening both here and abroad, but are being caused by the very things they love. They are a temporary escape from personal problems, a repast from areas where people may need personal growth in order to become complete people. They divide attention away from crooked political practices, government officials and their behavior, and the laws they pass to constrict the freedoms of the American people. It makes sense, then, that those in power manipulate said distractions for that purpose, moving the public eye away from themselves so they may keep figuring out how to fleece us again and again.

Monday, October 15, 2012

Lao Tzu and Justice


Hello, all. I know it's been a while since my last post, and I'm sorry for that. I have been covertly maneuvering for a position of power inside the existing structure so that my actions may be more effective and my words may be heard over greater distances. I am hoping that once I am able to gain sustained capital, I will be able to use said capital to actually assist the movement on a greater scale by providing shelter, food, and communications with the outside world that would normally not have it. That is my long term goal, and I hope that you all will support me in it. In the meantime, I will be posting periodically thoughts, stories, and such.

The following is a story that was relayed to me by a friend. I believe it is vital to our movement to share it with you all.


Lao Tzu & Justice

"Lao Tzu was a true revolutionary. He was guided by the inner-light and wisdom. Once, the emperor invited Lao Tzu to be his chief minister.

But he rejected that offer stating, "This will not work out, for it will be hard for us to agree on any issues. You live by the principles and norms set by your ancestors, and I live guided by my conscience."

But the emperor was unable to accept Lao Tzu's rejection and said that he was certain that it would not cause any complications to him. On the very first day of Lao Tzu accepting the responsibility of the chief minister, a theft-case came to the court. The person accused accepted that he did rob from the wealthiest man in town. In response, Lao Tzu pronounced his judgment on the case. He sentenced the thief to six months in prison, but he also sentenced the wealthy merchant (from who the thief stole) to six months in prison.

"What did I steal? I am the victim! Why do I get punished? Are you mad? Has it ever happened in history where the person whose property is stolen was also punished?" the flustered merchant exclaimed.

Lao Tzu explained very patiently,"Truly speaking, I should have given you a bigger sentence than the one I gave to the thief. Since I am very kind at heart, I did not do that. You have amassed the entire city's wealth.Tell me, how did you accumulate so much? Did it all rain down from the sky? Who is responsible for so many people becoming poor and for changing some of them into thieves? It is you. What you have done is the bigger crime. What the thief has done does not appear to be much of a crime to me. Truly, the wealth that you have amassed by making so many people poor so that you can accumulate more and more is a much greater crime."

The wealthy merchant thought Lao Tzu was mad, so he humbly pleaded for an audience with the emperor. Even the emperor, when in crisis, borrowed money from the merchant, and so the emperor gave him audience. When he met the emperor, he explained what had happened at the court. He further cautioned the emperor,"If you allow Lao Tzu in the court to remain longer, you too may some day end up behind bars. He might question how you have amassed so much wealth, and if I am seen as a criminal, you may then be seen as a bigger criminal."

The emperor understood what Lao Tzu had implied earlier and he spoke to him. "I feel what you had said earlier about how we would be unable to come to the same conclusion on issues on coming to agreement to be true. Yes, it would be difficult for us both to reach an agreement on most issues. You are relieved from your responsibility of being my chief minister."
_________________________________________________________________________________
     So, who belongs in jail, reader? Those of us who may have resorted to less than legal means to earn a living, or those who preside over us, ripping away our ability to survive and outlawing or taxing our ability to gain raw materials to use? Should we imprison those who shoplift and sell illegal things to make a living, or should we imprison those who make it impossible to make money for those who do? Think: if one cannot grow food on land because it "belongs" to the government, cannot shoot or trap small game because of some abstract law attaching heavy fines to it, or afford to go to the store and pay for food because they haven't found a job in this horrible recession, should we fault them for doing what they have to do to in order to survive?