Good day, World.
We live in a country where everything has been sexed up in order to pull money out of us. For men, they use beautiful women and body parts to advertise everything from sports and cars to food and hygiene items. These things are spun as badges of success or attractiveness, items that will definitely impress a woman enough to make her at least want to sleep with you. Meanwhile, women's sexuality is used to manipulate them into spending money in order to either appeal to us or at the very least to "feel more confident" and conventionally attractive. Either way, the ultimate goal of these advertisers is to play on people's emotional immaturity, personal insecurities, and hormones in order to pump more money out of our wallets and back upstream.
Unfortunately, the transactional nature of the society we live in has scaled this idea into the meta, as both capitalism and religion have created artificial barriers to sex. Instead of two responsible people who are attracted to each other feeling as if they can pursue having relations immediately, now they have to consider the following in no particular order:
1.) Whether their chosen invisible friend approves of their choice or not;
2.) The state of their physical health/sexual safety;
3.) Whether or not they can impress or even hold the attention of the other with their physical items/residence;
4.) The potential financial fallout of negative consequences in the future.
All of these aspects involve finances in a way, as even religion has tithing and offering giving to the church. Health care is directly connected to your bank account, possessions are by nature capitalistic, and the ramifications of undesired outcomes on one's money cannot be overstated. This means that sex in our society is tied very purposely to money, with the most obvious consequence of that being the existence of prostitution. If these barriers didn't exist, would there be a need for it, or would people who normally would be separated by these things be allowed to interact with each other freely? This is tangential conjecture, but a point to consider.
While all these considerations are being made by people who want to have sex with each other, the animal urges to orgasm and feel the endorphins created by it rages underneath for many. This seething sexual tension is the motivating factor these companies have seized upon to take your money from you, as we are all humans with the desire to feel good. This is why Ashley Madison exists, ads on porn encourage you to cheat, and pop music and media push the narrative of "side chicks" and "other men." Irresponsibility breeds more money being spent in this deluded society, so why not support the artist that makes people spend more?
However, this overarching structure leaves men with the feeling that they are worthless and will never have sex with anyone unless they are rich or conform to a narrow standard. It makes women seem to only want men for their money or the appearance of such, and as men are generally bad at listening to women, they accept that as a talking point. Indeed, these power structures will additionally elevate women who reinforce this idea of patriarchal wealth equalling sexual value, as well, while they reject all but the safest forms of female rebellion and freedom. The safest forms (gay-inclusive pop music, films with female protagonists, female characters in kids shows etc.) are monetized beyond moral value, making them almost hypocritical when you see the environment that produced them. Yes, the idea that men are not valued and attracted to based solely upon their financial worth is quite feminist and anti-capitalist, as if you invert the thought it becomes "Just because you're rich doesn't make you a man worthy of giving my body to."
So what happens when a system convinces you women will never fuck you unless you fill a long, difficult checklist? What about when you are in the process of filling out said list, but she doesn't want to anyway? Well, if you managed to ignore the entire wall of shit that is the Capitalist Sex Manifesto, you would remember that women are people, not NPCs with a dialogue tree that will lead to sex if you hit the right button combos. Women's health issues, individual desires, and opinions on what constitutes being "sexy" are all factors in how things go. Unfortunately, it is easier when slighted to recede into the arms of someone who will reinforce your ideas rather than challenge them. This is how the so-called "manosphere" began to form, with the bad actors and spouters of quasi-scientific malarkey primed to swoop in and take advantage of emotionally unintelligent men. This creates an anger based solely upon the perception that women are guilty of withholding something they deserve, as they have gone down the checklist they created with little input from women and found themselves without a partner.
"It's women's fault that I'm not in a relationship."
"Women have all the power when it comes to sex."
"Immigrant men should be ejected, but immigrant women should have one year to get with a white incel to keep their citizenship."
These are paraphrasings of clips I've heard online just this past week.
Remove your need for sex from women's responsibility. Your lack of orgasms is absolutely your fault, and it has nothing to do with your checklist. You have a hand, right? Use it to masturbate instead of writing hate messages about how your wife won't fuck you to your friends. Jerk off instead of posting memes about how dumb women are or pictures of other women in bikinis. Then maybe you can calmly sit down with a woman you're intimate with (or trying to be) and talk about it instead of the hormones hijacking your brain before you speak. Maybe it has nothing to do with physical attraction or even you at all. This open hostility towards women because all of the ones men are attracted to don't have a magnetic pussy that draws just their individual penis into it has to stop immediately.
--------
Just here. Nowhere else.
-∅
